An analysis of the juvenile court system in the united states

This system was to differ from adult or criminal court in a number of ways.

An analysis of the juvenile court system in the united states

In re Gault U. Cook, on June 8, Gault arrived at the Detention Home, she was told that a hearing was scheduled in juvenile court the following day.

An analysis of the juvenile court system in the united states

The petition was not served on Gault or his parents. The June 9 hearing was informal. Not only was Mrs. Cook not present, but no transcript or recording was made, and no one was sworn in prior to testifying.

Gault was questioned by the judge and there are conflicting accounts as to what, if anything, Gault admitted. After the hearing, Gault was taken back to the Detention Home.

Juvenile Justice History — Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice

He was detained for another two or three days before being released. When Gault was released, his parents were notified that another hearing was scheduled for June 15, Cook was again not present for the June 15th hearing, despite Mrs.

At this hearing, the probation officers filed a report listing the charge as lewd phone calls. The report was not disclosed to Gault or his parents.

At the conclusion of the hearing, the judge committed Gault to juvenile detention for six years, until he turned The Court agreed to hear the case to determine the procedural due process rights of a juvenile criminal defendant.

The proceedings against Gault were conducted by a judge of the Superior Court of Arizona who was designated by his colleagues to serve as a juvenile court judge.

An analysis of the juvenile court system in the united states

The juvenile court judge committed Gault to juvenile detention until he attained the age of At that time, no appeal was permitted in juvenile cases by Arizona law; therefore, a habeas petition was filed in the Supreme Court of Arizona and referred to the Superior Court for a hearing.

The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case to determine the procedural rights of a juvenile defendant in delinquency proceedings where there is a possibility of incarceration. In its opinion, the Court unanimously overruled Betts v.

January 15, Decided: March 18, Unanimous Decision: Justice Fortas wrote the opinion of the court. Justices Douglas, Clark, and Harlan each wrote concurring opinions. The Court noted that, had Gault been 18 at the time of his arrest, he would have been afforded the procedural safeguards available to adults.

The Court closely examined the juvenile court system, ultimately determining that, while there are legitimate reasons for treating juveniles and adults differently, juveniles facing an adjudication of delinquency and incarceration are entitled to certain procedural safeguards under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.Part One.

Delinquency age boundaries

Part Two. Part Three. Part Four: UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, Part One. Author: William Kehen, PhD. Columbia University. The federal government of the United States was created by the Constitution, which went into operation in when the first Congress convened and George Washington took the oath of office as president.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

What we cover

By the end of the first decade of the 21 st century, states such as California were instituting the most sweeping reforms in the history of the juvenile justice system. For examples of juvenile justice system reform efforts visit.

On Thursday, June 1, , the Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued its long-awaited report on the management of the immigration court system . May 09,  · Some children and youth become involved with the juvenile justice system because they are accused of committing a delinquent or criminal act.

Other youth come into contact with the system for status offenses—actions that are illegal only because of a youth’s age—such as truancy, underage drinking, and running away from home.

A separate juvenile justice system was established in the United States about years ago with the goal of diverting youthful offenders from the destructive punishments of criminal courts and encouraging rehabilitation based on the individual juvenile's needs.

United States Courts |